Factors Affecting Reliability in Psychological Tests
Psychologists who study psychometrics (the science of psychological test and measurements) identify two categories of factors that affect the reliability of psychological tests. The first category is factors related to the construction of the tests, these are called systemic errors and are built into the test. The second category is factors that arise from random issues related to the how the test is given or how the test is taken. These factors are called unsystematic errors and have nothing to do with the test itself.
Question Construction
Researchers construct questions on psychological tests to bring about a response on some mental quality such as depression. If test questions are difficult, confusing or ambiguous, reliability is negatively affected. Some people read the question to mean one thing, whereas others read the same question to mean something else. Errors in question construction are systemic errors and can be corrected only through research and redesign of the test.
- Researchers construct questions on psychological tests to bring about a response on some mental quality such as depression.
- If test questions are difficult, confusing or ambiguous, reliability is negatively affected.
Administration Errors
Drugs That Affect a Lie Detector Test
Learn More
Instructions with the test may contain errors that create another type of systemic error. These errors exist in either the instructions provided to the test-taker or those given to the psychologist who is conducting the test. Instructions that interfere with accurately gathering information (such as a time limit when the measure the test is seeking has nothing to do with speed) reduce the reliability of a test.
Scoring Errors
Reliable tests have an accurate method of scoring and interpreting the results. All tests come with a set of instructions on scoring. Errors in these instructions, such as making unsupported conclusions, reduce the reliability of the test. Test construction begins with research to support the conclusions drawn--but if the research has flaws, again a system error may result.
- Reliable tests have an accurate method of scoring and interpreting the results.
Environmental Factors
List of Psychological Tests
Learn More
Environmental factors such as uncomfortable room temperature, or distracting sounds are one form of unsystematic errors. The errors made by the psychologist proving a test are another type of environmental factor that can affect reliability. Although psychologists are trained in psychological testing, human error is always a possibility 13. The administrator’s attitude toward the test-taker also influences scoring or interpretation when clinical judgment is called for in the test instructions.
- Environmental factors such as uncomfortable room temperature, or distracting sounds are one form of unsystematic errors.
- The errors made by the psychologist proving a test are another type of environmental factor that can affect reliability.
Test-Taker Factors
We often think that factors related to the test-taker have an effect on reliability. However, factors related to the test-taker, such as poor sleep, feeling ill, anxious or “stressed-out” are integrated into the test itself. Solid reliable tests do not claim to give results that are the “real-score” of the test-taker--but rather a score that is a combination of both the “real-score” and the “error-score.” The real score is the test-taker's performance, and the error-score is a margin of error that is built into the test for factors such as poor sleep and anxiety. The factoring-in of the “error-score” makes it all the more important for other factors that negatively affect reliability to be low.
- We often think that factors related to the test-taker have an effect on reliability.
- The real score is the test-taker's performance, and the error-score is a margin of error that is built into the test for factors such as poor sleep and anxiety.
Related Articles
References
- “Psychological Testing: Principles and Application” 6th Ed. Kevin R. Murphy, 2005.
- “Psychological Testing and Assessment”; Ronald Jay Cohen & Mark Swerdlik; 2009
- “Psychological Testing: Principles, Applications and Issues”; Robert M. Kaplan and Dennis P. Saccuzzo; 2008
- Institute of Medicine. Psychological Testing In The Service Of Disability Determination. Washington: National Academies Press; 2015.
- Leppink J, Pérez-fuster P. We need more replication research - A case for test-retest reliability. Perspect Med Educ. 2017;6(3):158-164. doi:10.1007/s40037-017-0347-z
- Albers MJ.. Introduction to quantitative data analysis in the behavioral and social sciences. Wiley. 2017.
- Hu Y, Nesselroade JR, Erbacher MK, et al. Test reliability at the individual level. Struct Equ Modeling. 2016;23(4):532‐543. doi:10.1080/10705511.2016.1148605
- Polit DF. Getting serious about test-retest reliability: a critique of retest research and some recommendations. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(6):1713-20. doi:10.1007/s11136-014-0632-9
Resources
Writer Bio
Thom Mote began writing professionally in 2008 and his work appears on various websites. As a counselor in private practice, Mote has been providing workshops on mental health since 1996. He has a Bachelor of Science in psychology and a Master of Education in counseling from the University of Tennessee.